|
PD's
Homepage

CM130 Intro. to Comm.
CM205 Media Writing
CM211 Desktop Publishing
CM212 Photojournalism
CM214 Graphic Design
CM215 Journalism
CM310 Biz-Pro Speech
CM316 MM Public Comm.
CM317 Pro. Interviewing
CM402 Internship
CM471 Sr. Project
BU360 Biz Comm.
SS400
Sr. Seminar
Syllabi Intro.
NetLearn
Moodle

PowerPoint Tips
PowerPoint Tutorial
Speech Checklist
Speech
Rubric
Joseph Slife's Web
Speech Blog
Learning Styles
FAQs
About PD
Contact PD
| |
More on
Writing Critiques
Developed
by The Writing Center at
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.
Retrieved
1-31-06
Click
here for more on APA and MLA
styles.
When college professors ask you to write a critique of a text, they usually
expect you to analyze and evaluate, not just summarize. A summary merely reports
what the text said; that is, it answers only the question, "What did the
author say?" A critique, on the other hand, analyzes, interprets, and
evaluates the text, answering the questions how? why? and how well? A critique
does not necessarily have to criticize the piece in a negative sense. Your
reaction to the text may be largely positive, negative, or a combination of the
two. It is important to explain why you respond to the text in a certain way.
Step 1. Analyze the text
As you read the book or article you plan to critique, the following questions
will help you analyze the text:
 | What is the author's main point?
|
 | What is the author's purpose?
|
 | Who is the author's intended audience?
|
 | What arguments does the author use to
support the main point?
|
 | What evidence does the author present to
support the arguments?
|
 | What are the author's underlying
assumptions or biases? |
You may find it useful to make notes about
the text based on these questions as you read.
Step 2. Evaluate the text
After you have read the text, you can begin to evaluate the author's ideas. The
following questions provide some ideas to help you evaluate the text:
 | Is the argument logical?
|
 | Is the text well-organized, clear, and
easy to read?
|
 | Are the author's facts accurate?
|
 | Have important terms been clearly defined?
|
 | Is there sufficient evidence for the
arguments?
|
 | Do the arguments support the main point?
|
 | Is the text appropriate for the intended
audience?
|
 | Does the text present and refute opposing
points of view?
|
 | Does the text help you understand the
subject?
|
 | Are there any words or sentences that
evoke a strong response from you? What are those words or sentences? What is
your reaction?
|
 | What is the origin of your reaction to
this topic? When or where did you first learn about it? Can you think of
people, articles, or discussions that have influenced your views? How might
these be compared or contrasted to this text?
|
 | What questions or observations does this
article suggest? That is, what does the article make you think about? |
Step 3. Plan and write your critique
Write your critique in standard essay form. It is generally best not to follow
the author's organization when organizing your analysis, since this approach
lends itself to summary rather than analysis. Begin with an introduction that
defines the subject of your critique and your point of view. Defend your point
of view by raising specific issues or aspects of the argument. Conclude your
critique by summarizing your argument and re-emphasizing your opinion.
 | You will first need to identify and
explain the author's ideas. Include specific passages that support your
description of the author's point of view.
|
 | Offer your own opinion. Explain what you
think about the argument. Describe several points with which you agree or
disagree.
|
 | For each of the points you mention,
include specific passages from the text (you may summarize, quote, or
paraphrase) that provide evidence for your point of view.
|
 | Explain how the passages support your
opinion. |
Source of information: Rosen, Leonard J. and
Laurence Behrens, eds. The Allyn & Bacon Handbook. 1994.
|